Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

VENTAJA COMPETITIVA Y DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO

Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2014): Innovación y competitividad. Impulsores del desarrollo. ISBN: 978-607-96203-0-3

Creative industries innovation using galois group theory

Enviado
diciembre 1, 2016
Publicado
2018-01-05

Resumen

To address creative industries’ challenges with an innovative Fuzzy Logic approach. A robust methodological structure using Galois Group Theory and an intuitive application for decision making under uncertain conditions is proposed. Results conclude that products with different characteristics, properties and peculiarities can be grouped with a high confidence level through an intuitive fuzzy methodological approach. The present study pretends to shed light in grouping methodologies, attending challenges in which traditional grouping methods, which are mainly driven by trial and error efforts have not succeed before. The methodology is applied in order to group a specific city’s tourism products; the attempt is to achieve an effective decision making process. The originality of the study relies on the capacity and flexibility of the model to analyze different characteristics of diverse products under subjective and uncertain conditions and the implementation of solid theories from a fuzzy logic standpoint.

Citas

  1. Artin, E. (1998). Galois theory, second éd. Dover, New York, NY.
  2. Bellman, R. E. & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment.Management science, 17(4), B-141.
  3. Chen, Y. (2006). Marketing innovation. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15(1), 101123.
  4. Denecke, K. & Wismath, S. L. (Eds.). (2004). Galois connections and applications 565. Springer.
  5. Edwards, S. A. & Tardieu, O. (1984). Galois theory.
  6. Florida, R. (2008). Who's Your City?, Basic Books, USA.
  7. Florida, R. (2012). The rise of the creative class: revisited. Basic books. USA.
  8. Gil-Aluja, J. (1999). Elements for a theory of decision in uncertainty, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
  9. Gil-Laufente, J. (2002), Algoritmos Para La Excelencia: Claves para el éxito en la gestión deportiva, Milladoiro, Spain.
  10. Gil-Aluja, J., Gil-Lafuente, A. M. & Merigó, J. M. (2011). Using homogeneous groupings in portfolio management. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(9), 10950-10958.
  11. Gil-Lafuente, A. M. & Paula, L. B. (2013). Algorithm applied in the identification of stakeholders. Kybernetes, 42(5), 674-685.
  12. Hall, P., (2000), Creative Cities and Economic Development, Urban Studies, 37(4), 639–649.
  13. Kaufmann, A. y Jaime, G. A. (1988). Modelos para la investigación de los efectos olvidados. Milladoiro. Vigo (Spain).
  14. Keropyan, A. y Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2013). A personal selection model using Galois group theory. Kybernetes, 42(5), 711-719.
  15. Charles, L. (2000). The creative city: a toolkit for urban innovators. London, Sterling. VA: Comedia. Metropoles, C. (2010). How to support creative industries, Available at: http://www.creativemetropoles.eu/
  16. OECD. (2005). Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. France: OECD. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard business review.
  17. Ribeiro, R. A. (1996). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: a review and new preference elicitation techniques. Fuzzy sets and systems, 78(2), 155-181.
  18. UNCTAD. (2010). Information Economy Report, Available at: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=plh&AN=65052121&site=bsi-live
  19. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338-353.