Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

ESTRATEGIAS, MERCADOS E INSTITUCIONES FINANCIERAS

Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2011): La competitividad, elemento clave para la recuperación económica

La estructura del gobierno corporativo en Latinoamérica y su impacto en la gestión del recurso humano y el desempeño financiero

Enviado
junio 30, 2016
Publicado
2018-08-23

Resumen

En el presente trabajo se estudia el impacto de la estructura de gobierno corporativo en la gestión de recursos humanos y el desempeño financiero en el contexto latinoamericano. Para ello, se analizará el concepto de gobierno corporativo. Más tarde, se tratarán dos corrientes que estudiar tanto la estructura de gobierno corporativo como el comportamiento de los directivos, la teoría de la agencia y la teoría de stewardship. Se encuentra que la estructura del gobierno corporativo y las competencias del recurso humano están positivamente relacionadas con el desempeño financiero de la empresa.

Citas

  1. Anderson, D. W., Melanson, J. S., Maly, J. (2007). The Evolution of Corporate Governance: power redistribution brings boards to life. Corporate Governance, 15(5), 780 – 797
  2. Barney, J. B., Wright, P. M. (1998). On Becoming a Strategic Partner: The Role of Human Resources in Gaining Competitive Advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31 – 46.
  3. Braun, M., Sharma, A. (2007). Should the CEO Also Be Chair of Board? An Empirical Examination of Family – Controlled Public Firms. Family Business Review, 20(2), 111 – 126
  4. Caldwell, C., Hayes, L., Karri, R., Bernal, P. (2008). Ethical Stewardship – Implications for Leadership and Trust. Journal of Business Ethics, (78), 153–164.
  5. Caldwell, C., Karri, R., Vollmar, P. (2006). Principal Theory and Principle Theory: Ethical Governance from the Follower's Perspective. Joumal of Business Ethics, (66), 207–223. doi: 10.1007/sl0551-005-5586-y
  6. Caldwell, C., Truong, D., Linh, P., Tuan, A. (2010). Strategic Human Resource Management as Ethical Stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0541-y
  7. Cano Morales, A. M., Orduz Aguilar, C. I. Hoyos Ramírez. A. E. (2002). Gobierno Corporativo: Principales desarrollos en las empresas que cotizan en la Bolsa de Valores de Colombia, Medellín, Colombia: Editorial Universidad de Medellín.
  8. Chavarín-Rodríguez, R. (2011). Los grupos económicos en México a partir de una tipología de arquitectura y gobierno corporativo y una revisión de sus explicaciones teóricas. El Trimestre Económico, 78(309), 193 – 234.
  9. Chowdhury y Geringer (2001). Institutional Ownership, Strategic Choices and Corporate Efficiency: Evidence From Japan, Journal of Management Studies, 38(2), 271 – 293
  10. Clarke, T. (2004). Introduction: Theories of Corporate Governance – Reconceptualizing Corporate Governance Theory After the Enron Experience en Thomas Clarke (ed.) Theories of Corporate Governance. The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate Governance. USA and Canada: Routledge. 1 – 29
  11. Daily, D. y Dalton, C. (1994). Bankruptcy and Corporate Governance: The Impact of Board Composition and Structure, Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1603-1617
  12. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20 - 47
  13. Déniz - Déniz, M. de la C. & De Saá - Pérez, . (2003). A Resource-based View of Corporate Responsiveness toward Employees. Organization Studies, 24(2), 299–319
  14. Dicke, L. A., Ott, J. S. (2002). A Test: Can Stewardship Theory Serve as a Second Conceptual Foundation for Accountability Methods in Contracted Human Services? International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 463 – 487
  15. Finkelstein, S y D’Aveni, R. (1994). CEO Duality as a Double-Edged Sword: How Boards of Directors Balance Entrenchment Avoidance and Unity of Comand, Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1079-1108
  16. Fox, M., Hamilton, R. T. (1994). Ownership and Diversification: Agency Theory o Stewardship Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 69 – 81
  17. Freeman, R. E.: (1984). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pittman-Ballinger
  18. Hayes, B. E. (1999). Cómo medir la satisfacción del cliente: Diseño de encuestas, uso y métodos de análisis estadístico. México: Alfaomega – Oxford
  19. Hernández, I. (2005). Forma Legal, Innovación y Productividad de las Firmas en la Industria Manufacturera Colombina. Cuadernos de Economía, 42,135 – 160
  20. Khanna, T., Palepu, K. (1999). Emerging Market Business Groups, Foreign Investors, and Corporate Governance. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper, 6955. Recuperado de: http://www.nber.org/papers/w6955
  21. Lansberg, I., Gersick, K. E. (2006). Sello de Familia: Cultura y Gobierno Corporativo en la Empresa Familiar Latinoamericana. Harvard Business Review América Latina, (8), 30 – 42
  22. Lee, P.M., O’Neill, H. M. (2003). Ownership Structures and R&D Investments of U.S. and Japanese Firms: Agency and Stewardship Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212 – 225 Le Breton –
  23. Miller, I., Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. Stewardship in Public Family Firms: A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1169 – 1191
  24. López-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortés, E. & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2008). Complementary Resources and Capabilities for an Ethical and Environmental Management: A Qual/Quan Study. Journal of Business Ethics. 82, 701–732
  25. López Cabrales, A., Perez – Luño, A, Valle – Cabrera, R. (2009). Knowlwedge as a mediator between hrm practices and innovative activity. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 485 – 503
  26. Martínez, A. (2004). Estructura de Poder del Consejo de Administración y Creación de Valor, XVIII Congreso Anual y XIV Congreso Hispano -Frances de AEDEM, 14
  27. Martínez, L., M., Stuart, M. (2002). Assessing the principles of partnership: Workplace trade union representatives’ attitudes and experiences, Employee Relations, 24 (3), 305 – 320
  28. Miller, D., Le Breton–Miller, I. (2008). Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities. Family Business Reviw, 19(1), 73 – 87
  29. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339 – 358
  30. Snell, S. L. (1992). Control Theory in Strategic Human Resource Management: The mediating effect of Administrative Information. Academy of Management Journal. 35(2), 292 – 337
  31. Sternberger, W. B. (2002). The changing role of the human resource profession: The transformation of the HR function from an administrative, transactional orientation into a strategic business partnership. Tesis Doctoral, Union Institute and University
  32. Sundaramurthy, C., Lewis, M. (2003). Control and Collaboration: Paradoxes of Governance. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397 – 415.
  33. Supangco, V. T. (2001). The Human Resource Management Function and Perception of Organizational Performance. Philippine Management Review, 9, 65 – 74
  34. Supangco, V. T. (2006). HR Involvement in Corporate Governance. Philippine Management Review, 13, 101 – 116
  35. Tosi, H. L., Brownlee, A. L., Silva, P., Katz, J. P. (2003). An Empirical Exploration of Decision – making Under Agency Controls and Stewardship Structure. Journal of Management Studies, 40(8), 2053 – 2071
  36. Westhead, P., Howorth, C. (2006). Ownership and Management Issues Associated with Family Firm Performance and Company Objectives. Family Business Review. 19(4), 301 – 316.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>